- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 50 Pro 4G vs Neo 5 GT
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G vs ZTE Neo 5 GT
What Camon 50 Pro 4G does better (8) and where Neo 5 GT wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display9.8
9.0Camera6.1
8.6Battery9.0
5.8Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 50 Pro 4GNeo 5 GT
| Camon 50 Pro 4G | Neo 5 GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 163.6 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.4 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 200 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 50 Pro 4G better than Neo 5 GT?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Neo 5 GT: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Neo 5 GT: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Neo 5 GT: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight171 g vs 200 g+17%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8.4 mm+14%
Why is Neo 5 GT better than Camon 50 Pro 4G?
- 5GNo · Camon 50 Pro 4G: Yes
- Wired charging60 W vs 80 W+33%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 439 ppi+2%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 6+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Unspecified | — |
| Colours | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 439 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 569,394 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,034 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 6,210 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | proximity, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | MyOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 74 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
