- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 50 Pro 4G vs S2 FE
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G vs Vivo S2 FE
What Camon 50 Pro 4G does better (12) and where S2 FE wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display9.3
9.0Camera6.3
8.6Battery8.9
5.8Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 50 Pro 4GS2 FE
| Camon 50 Pro 4G | S2 FE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 163.9 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.6 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 224 g | −53 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 50 Pro 4G better than S2 FE?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · S2 FE: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · S2 FE: No
- NFCYes · S2 FE: No
- Wired charging60 W vs 44 W+36%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Weight171 g vs 224 g+31%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · S2 FE: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · S2 FE: No
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8.6 mm+16%
Why is S2 FE better than Camon 50 Pro 4G?
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+63%
- 5GNo · Camon 50 Pro 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 450 ppi+5%
- Resolution (width)1,208 px vs 1,260 px+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 224 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Unspecified | — |
| Colours | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue | Stellar Green, Zen White, Titan Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 2,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 89.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7300e |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 |
| AnTuTu score | 569,394 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,034 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.93" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 60 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.14 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
