android.gs
Compare
Camon 50 Pro 4G vs iQOO Z11x (China)

Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G vs Vivo iQOO Z11x (China)

What Camon 50 Pro 4G does better (15) and where iQOO Z11x (China) wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Tecno · 2026Camon 50 Pro 4G

8.6Score

15 advantages

Higher score

Vivo · 2026iQOO Z11x (China)

8.3Score

10 advantages≈ $210

9.7Display7.1

4.5Performance7.0

9.0Camera5.4

8.6Battery8.7

5.8Features8.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

Camon 50 Pro 4GiQOO Z11x (China)

	Camon 50 Pro 4G	iQOO Z11x (China)	Difference
Height	162.4 mm	166.6 mm	−4.2 mm
Width	77 mm	78.4 mm	−1.4 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	8.4 mm	−1 mm
Weight	171 g	219 g	−48 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Camon 50 Pro 4G better than iQOO Z11x (China)?

OLED panelYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
Wired charging60 W vs 44 W+36%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Rear cameras3 vs 13×
Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
Weight171 g vs 219 g+28%
Memory card slotYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
Pixel density429 ppi vs 382 ppi+12%
Charged in 30 min44% vs 35%+26%

Why is iQOO Z11x (China) better than Camon 50 Pro 4G?

AnTuTu score569,394 vs 983,562+73%
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,034 vs 2,988+47%
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
5GNo · Camon 50 Pro 4G: Yes
Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 7,200 mAh+17%
Max video1080p vs 4K
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 6+50%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G8.6	Vivo iQOO Z11x (China)≈ $2108.3
Design
Weight	171 g	219 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	8.4 mm
Height	162.4 mm	166.6 mm
Width	77 mm	78.4 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Unspecified	—
Colours	Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue	Black, White, Green
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,208 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,644 px	2,344 px
Pixel density	429 ppi	382 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,200 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.6%	85.8%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate	Mediatek Dimensity 7400
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	569,394	983,562
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,034	2,988
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	—
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/2.93"
Rear cameras	3	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	6,150 mAh	7,200 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Si/C
Wired charging	60 W	44 W
Charged in 30 min	44%	35%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 4	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	HIOS 16	OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised	3	—

Related comparisons

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 Pro 4G8.68.6

Samsung Galaxy A37vsTecno Camon 50 Pro 4G8.68.6

Gigaset GX50vsTecno Camon 50 Pro 4G8.78.6

nubia Air ProvsTecno Camon 50 Pro 4G8.78.6