- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 50 4G vs nubia Neo 5 Pro
Tecno Camon 50 4G vs ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro
What Camon 50 4G does better (13) and where nubia Neo 5 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display8.6
8.2Camera6.1
8.5Battery8.9
5.8Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 50 4Gnubia Neo 5 Pro
| Camon 50 4G | nubia Neo 5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 166.1 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 78.8 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.5 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 210 g | −38 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 50 4G better than nubia Neo 5 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+2%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Weight172 g vs 210 g+22%
- Memory card slotYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 387 ppi+11%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.5 mm+13%
- Resolution (width)1,208 px vs 1,080 px+12%
Why is nubia Neo 5 Pro better than Camon 50 4G?
- Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
- 5GNo · Camon 50 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+23%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- eSIMNo · Camon 50 4G: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 166.1 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 78.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Unspecified | — |
| Colours | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Mint cream | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate | Unisoc T9100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 |
| AnTuTu score | 595,376 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,020 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | MyOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
