- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 50 4G vs Redmi Note 17 (India/China)
Tecno Camon 50 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 (India/China)
What Camon 50 4G does better (13) and where Redmi Note 17 (India/China) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display9.0
8.2Camera4.6
8.5Battery9.0
5.8Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 50 4GRedmi Note 17 (India/China)
| Camon 50 4G | Redmi Note 17 (India/China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 169.7 mm | −7.3 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 79.1 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 225 g | −53 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 50 4G better than Redmi Note 17 (India/China)?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 17 (India/China): No
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 17 (India/China): No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Weight172 g vs 225 g+31%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Redmi Note 17 (India/China): No
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 375 ppi+14%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.4 mm+12%
- Resolution (width)1,208 px vs 1,080 px+12%
Why is Redmi Note 17 (India/China) better than Camon 50 4G?
- Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+30%
- 5GNo · Camon 50 4G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 7″+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 169.7 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 79.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Unspecified | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Mint cream | Black, Purple, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,396 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 375 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 88.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm SM4450-AF Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 595,376 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,020 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,150 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
