How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Camon 50 4G vs Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

Tecno Camon 50 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

What Camon 50 4G does better (7) and where Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Tecno Camon 50 4G
Tecno · 2026Camon 50 4G
8.5Score
7 advantages
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
Xiaomi · 2026Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
8.3Score
8 advantages≈ $310
9.7Display9.0
5.1Performance4.2
8.2Camera8.7
8.5Battery8.7
5.8Features6.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Camon 50 4GRedmi Note 15 Pro 4G
77.2 × 162.47.576.3 × 163.28
Camon 50 4GRedmi Note 15 Pro 4GDifference
Height162.4 mm163.2 mm−0.8 mm
Width77.2 mm76.3 mm+0.9 mm
Thickness7.5 mm8 mm−0.5 mm
Weight172 g195 g−23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Camon 50 4G better than Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G?

  1. AnTuTu score595,376 vs 414,497+44%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
  3. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  4. Weight172 g vs 195 g+13%
  5. Pixel density429 ppi vs 388 ppi+11%
  6. Resolution (width)1,208 px vs 1,080 px+12%
  7. Thickness7.5 mm vs 8 mm+7%

Why is Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G better than Camon 50 4G?

  1. Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+6%
  4. Major OS updates promised3 vs 4+33%
  5. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  6. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
  7. Charged in 30 min44% vs 50%+14%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight172 g195 g
Thickness7.5 mm8 mm
Height162.4 mm163.2 mm
Width77.2 mm76.3 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
BackPlasticPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP65
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx5
Glass protectionUnspecifiedCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursMoonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Mint creamBlack, Glacier Blue, Titanium
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,208 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,644 px2,392 px
Pixel density429 ppi388 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,350 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.4%89.1%
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G200 UltimateMediatek Helio G200 Ultra
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process6 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score595,376414,497
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,0201,994
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—378
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.4"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,150 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)—16.4 h
Wired charging45 W45 W
Charged in 30 min44%50%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-22.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—0.97 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHIOS 16HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised34
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—63 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare