- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 40 Pro vs V60 Lite 5G
Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs Vivo V60 Lite 5G
What Camon 40 Pro does better (7) and where V60 Lite 5G wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.5Display8.4
9.1Camera5.3
7.3Battery9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 40 ProV60 Lite 5G
| Camon 40 Pro | V60 Lite 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 163.8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.3 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.7 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 194 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 40 Pro better than V60 Lite 5G?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · V60 Lite 5G: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · V60 Lite 5G: No
- Weight179 g vs 194 g+8%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 7.7 mm+5%
Why is V60 Lite 5G better than Camon 40 Pro?
- Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 194 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White | Vitality Powder, Titanium Mist Blue, Midnight Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,045 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 88.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 700,909 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,218 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 873 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2. | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 13.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsTecno Camon 40 Pro8.58.6
vsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5GvsTecno Camon 40 Pro8.58.6
vsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5GvsTecno Camon 40 Pro8.78.6
vsSamsung Galaxy S25 EdgevsTecno Camon 40 Pro8.88.6
vsMotorola Edge 60 FusionvsTecno Camon 40 Pro8.88.6vs
Tecno Camon 40 ProvsInfinix GT 30 Pro8.68.8