android.gs
Compare
Camon 40 Pro vs V50 Lite 4G

Tecno Camon 40 Pro vs Vivo V50 Lite 4G

What Camon 40 Pro does better (15) and where V50 Lite 4G wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Tecno · 2025Camon 40 Pro

8.6Score

15 advantages

Higher score

Vivo · 2025V50 Lite 4G

8.6Score

7 advantages≈ $190

8.5Display8.6

9.1Camera5.9

7.3Battery9.2

7.4Features6.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

Camon 40 ProV50 Lite 4G

	Camon 40 Pro	V50 Lite 4G	Difference
Height	164.3 mm	163.8 mm	+0.5 mm
Width	74.6 mm	76.3 mm	−1.7 mm
Thickness	7.3 mm	7.8 mm	−0.5 mm
Weight	179 g	196 g	−17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Camon 40 Pro better than V50 Lite 4G?

RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Optical stabilisationYes · V50 Lite 4G: No
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · V50 Lite 4G: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · V50 Lite 4G: No
Weight179 g vs 196 g+9%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%

Why is V50 Lite 4G better than Camon 40 Pro?

Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+25%
Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 1,800 nits+64%
Memory card slotNo · Camon 40 Pro: Yes
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+12%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Tecno Camon 40 Pro8.6	Vivo V50 Lite 4G≈ $1908.6
Design
Weight	179 g	196 g
Thickness	7.3 mm	7.8 mm
Height	164.3 mm	163.8 mm
Width	74.6 mm	76.3 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP65
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx5
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	—
Colours	Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White	Blue/Silver, Violet, Gold
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,436 px	2,392 px
Pixel density	393 ppi	388 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,100 nits	1,800 nits
Measured brightness	1,045 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89.7%	88.7%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7300	Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz
GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Adreno 610
AnTuTu score	700,909	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,218	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	873	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	60 fps	—
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,200 mAh	6,500 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Si/C
Active use (test)	13.8 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	65%	56%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	—
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 4	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-28.7 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	HIOS 15	Funtouch 15
Major OS updates promised	3	—
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	58 h
Repairability class	—	B
Drop resistance class	—	A