- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Armor 33
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs UleFone Armor 33
What Camon 40 Pro 4G does better (8) and where Armor 33 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display6.8
9.1Camera6.8
7.9Battery9.4
5.8Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 40 Pro 4GArmor 33
| Camon 40 Pro 4G | Armor 33 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 185.5 mm | −21.1 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 85.5 mm | −11.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 34 mm | −26.7 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 765 g | −587 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 40 Pro 4G better than Armor 33?
- Weight178 g vs 765 g4.3×
- OLED panelYes · Armor 33: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 33: No
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 34 mm4.7×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Screen-to-body ratio90% vs 72.3%+24%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/2+5%
Why is Armor 33 better than Camon 40 Pro 4G?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 25,500 mAh4.9×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wired charging45 W vs 66 W+47%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Camon 40 Pro 4G: Yes
- Screen size6.8″ vs 7″+3%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 765 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 34 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 185.5 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 700 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 72.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 600,062 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,953 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 25,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 382 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
