- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 30S Pro vs iQOO Z9x
Tecno Camon 30S Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z9x
What Camon 30S Pro does better (10) and where iQOO Z9x wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display6.9
8.2Camera5.4
7.4Battery8.2
3.7Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 30S ProiQOO Z9x
| Camon 30S Pro | iQOO Z9x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.6 mm | 165.7 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm | −0.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 30S Pro better than iQOO Z9x?
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Z9x: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z9x: No
- Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Z9x: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 8 MP6.2×
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,000 nits+30%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min67% vs 58%+16%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.5% vs 86.4%+4%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%
Why is iQOO Z9x better than Camon 30S Pro?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Stereo speakersNo · Camon 30S Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx4+33%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Camon 30S Pro: Yes
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 164.6 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Interstellar Grey, Pearl Gold, Shim Silver Green | Tornado Green (Northern Green), Storm Grey (Mystic Black), White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 729,289 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,836 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 67% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 20 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch OS 14 (International) |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
