- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 30 Pro vs Y200 GT
Tecno Camon 30 Pro vs Vivo Y200 GT
What Camon 30 Pro does better (10) and where Y200 GT wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display9.7
9.1Camera6.1
7.2Battery8.9
5.7Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 30 ProY200 GT
| Camon 30 Pro | Y200 GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 163.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 75.9 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 195 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 30 Pro better than Y200 GT?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y200 GT: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y200 GT: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.63 GHz+18%
- Weight189 g vs 195 g+3%
- Charged in 30 min64% vs 58%+10%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8 mm+4%
Why is Y200 GT better than Camon 30 Pro?
- Stereo speakersNo · Camon 30 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging70 W vs 80 W+14%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 998 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 89.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.63 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 720 |
| AnTuTu score | 949,357 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,931 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,727 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 14.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | OriginOS 4 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
