- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 30 Pro vs T3 Ultra
Tecno Camon 30 Pro vs Vivo T3 Ultra
What Camon 30 Pro does better (5) and where T3 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display9.4
7.4Performance8.4
9.1Camera9.1
7.2Battery8.5
5.7Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 30 ProT3 Ultra
| Camon 30 Pro | T3 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 164.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 74.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 192 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 30 Pro better than T3 Ultra?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCYes · T3 Ultra: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min64% vs 54%+19%
Why is T3 Ultra better than Camon 30 Pro?
- AnTuTu score949,357 vs 1,870,185+97%
- Stereo speakersNo · Camon 30 Pro: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,931 vs 5,471+39%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- Wired charging70 W vs 80 W+14%
- 4K selfie videoNo · Camon 30 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+8%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver | Lunar Gray, Frost Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 998 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 90.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | 949,357 | 1,870,185 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,931 | 5,471 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,727 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 14.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
