- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 20 Pro 5G vs Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
What Camon 20 Pro 5G does better (4) and where Redmi Note 12 Turbo wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.6
6.4Performance8.0
8.1Camera8.4
6.0Battery7.2
6.5Features7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 Pro 5GRedmi Note 12 Turbo
| Camon 20 Pro 5G | Redmi Note 12 Turbo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 161.1 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 181 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Pro 5G better than Redmi Note 12 Turbo?
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi Note 12 Turbo: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.91 GHz+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Redmi Note 12 Turbo better than Camon 20 Pro 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- AnTuTu score1,031,881 vs 1,333,299+29%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,905 vs 4,512+55%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,300 vs 1,962+51%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 83%2.2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Camon 20 Pro 5G: Yes
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 1,000 nits+11%
- Weight193 g vs 181 g+7%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue | Black, Blue, White, Harry Potter Edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 961 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 88.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.91 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 725 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,031,881 | 1,333,299 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,905 | 4,512 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300 | 1,962 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | MIUI 14 |
