- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 20 Pro 5G vs Poco X5
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X5
What Camon 20 Pro 5G does better (13) and where Poco X5 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display8.0
6.4Performance3.9
8.1Camera5.7
6.0Battery6.0
6.5Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 Pro 5GPoco X5
| Camon 20 Pro 5G | Poco X5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 165.9 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 189 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Pro 5G better than Poco X5?
- AnTuTu score1,031,881 vs 400,8952.6×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,300 vs 3583.6×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Poco X5: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco X5: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,905 vs 2,088+39%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+36%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%
Why is Poco X5 better than Camon 20 Pro 5G?
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 1,200 nits+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Camon 20 Pro 5G: Yes
- Weight193 g vs 189 g+2%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 50%+32%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 165.9 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 728 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 85% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,031,881 | 400,895 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,905 | 2,088 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300 | 358 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.52 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | MIUI 13 for POCO |
