- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 20 Pro 5G vs Y200 (India)
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G vs Vivo Y200 (India)
What Camon 20 Pro 5G does better (11) and where Y200 (India) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.5
8.1Camera7.7
6.0Battery5.1
6.5Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 Pro 5GY200 (India)
| Camon 20 Pro 5G | Y200 (India) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 162.4 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 74.9 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 190 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Pro 5G better than Y200 (India)?
- NFCYes · Y200 (India): No
- Stereo speakersYes · Y200 (India): No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+4%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2 GHz+50%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Y200 (India): No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Y200 (India): No
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 800 nits+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Y200 (India) better than Camon 20 Pro 5G?
- Wired charging33 W vs 44 W+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx4+33%
- Charged in 30 min38% vs 54%+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue | Jungle Green, Desert Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 88.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,031,881 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,905 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | Funtouch 13 |
