- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 20 Pro 5G vs Armor 21
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G vs UleFone Armor 21
What Camon 20 Pro 5G does better (10) and where Armor 21 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display6.7
8.1Camera6.6
6.0Battery8.5
6.5Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 Pro 5GArmor 21
| Camon 20 Pro 5G | Armor 21 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 176 mm | −13.3 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 81.6 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 18.1 mm | −10.3 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 400 g | −207 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Pro 5G better than Armor 21?
- Weight193 g vs 400 g2.1×
- OLED panelYes · Armor 21: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 21: No
- 5GYes · Armor 21: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor 21: No
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+36%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 18.1 mm2.3×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen-to-body ratio87% vs 72.6%+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is Armor 21 better than Camon 20 Pro 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 9,600 mAh+92%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 400 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 18.1 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 176 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 81.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 72.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,031,881 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,905 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 9,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 90 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
