- android.gs
- Compare
- P80 vs Camon 50 Pro 4G
TCL P80 vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
What P80 does better (7) and where Camon 50 Pro 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.7
8.3Camera9.0
6.8Battery8.6
8.2Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
P80Camon 50 Pro 4G
| P80 | Camon 50 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 162.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 77 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 178 g | 171 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P80 better than Camon 50 Pro 4G?
- 5GYes · Camon 50 Pro 4G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Pixel density447 ppi vs 429 ppi+4%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,208 px+6%
Why is Camon 50 Pro 4G better than P80?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+23%
- Telephoto cameraNo · P80: Yes
- Wired charging45 W vs 60 W+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · P80: Yes
- Weight178 g vs 171 g+4%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.4 mm+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 178 g | 171 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Unspecified |
| Colours | Sunlit Gold, Midnight Blue | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Ethereal blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,280 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 447 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,200 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Elite | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 569,394 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,034 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 60 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 3 |
