- android.gs
- Compare
- P80 Pro vs Pova 8 Pro
TCL P80 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
What P80 Pro does better (5) and where Pova 8 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.6
6.8Performance7.1
8.3Camera8.0
8.1Battery8.4
9.4Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
P80 ProPova 8 Pro
| P80 Pro | Pova 8 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 162.5 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 77.3 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 189 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P80 Pro better than Pova 8 Pro?
- AnTuTu score1,077,092 vs 994,646+8%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- eSIMYes · Pova 8 Pro: No
- Pixel density447 ppi vs 429 ppi+4%
- Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,208 px+6%
Why is Pova 8 Pro better than P80 Pro?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+12%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Peak brightness3,200 nits vs 4,500 nits+41%
- Memory card slotNo · P80 Pro: Yes
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 7.4 mm+12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 77.7 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Sunlit Gold, Midnight Blue | Arc White, Graphite Black, Tundra Green, Tonino Lamborghini Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,280 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 447 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,200 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 89.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Elite | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,077,092 | 994,646 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,172 | 3,200 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | TCL UI 9.1 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
