android.gs
Compare
60 NxtPaper 4G vs Spark 40 Pro+

TCL 60 NxtPaper 4G vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro+

What 60 NxtPaper 4G does better (6) and where Spark 40 Pro+ wins (14) — every spec side by side.

TCL · 202560 NxtPaper 4G

7.2Score

6 advantages≈ $220

Higher score

Tecno · 2025Spark 40 Pro+

7.2Score

14 advantages≈ $190

5.6Display9.6

6.7Camera5.3

7.4Battery6.5

6.4Features5.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

60 NxtPaper 4GSpark 40 Pro+

	60 NxtPaper 4G	Spark 40 Pro+	Difference
Height	167.6 mm	163.9 mm	+3.7 mm
Width	75.5 mm	75.8 mm	−0.3 mm
Thickness	7.9 mm	6.5 mm	+1.4 mm
Weight	190 g	160 g	+30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 60 NxtPaper 4G better than Spark 40 Pro+?

Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Spark 40 Pro+: No
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Spark 40 Pro+: No

Why is Spark 40 Pro+ better than 60 NxtPaper 4G?

Peak brightness550 nits vs 4,500 nits8.2×
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 144 Hz+60%
OLED panelNo · 60 NxtPaper 4G: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · 60 NxtPaper 4G: Yes
Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
Weight190 g vs 160 g+18%
Pixel density395 ppi vs 440 ppi+11%
CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
Thickness7.9 mm vs 6.5 mm+22%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	TCL 60 NxtPaper 4G≈ $2207.2	Tecno Spark 40 Pro+≈ $1907.2
Design
Weight	190 g	160 g
Thickness	7.9 mm	6.5 mm
Height	167.6 mm	163.9 mm
Width	75.5 mm	75.8 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP54	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx4
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Dark Black, Alps White	Nebula Black, Aurora White, Moon Titanium, Tundra Green
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,224 px
Resolution (height)	2,460 px	2,720 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	440 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	550 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,601 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.8%	89.3%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G92	Mediatek Helio G200
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	12 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G52 MC2	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	455,013
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	1,903
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	378
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	108 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.67"	1/2.8"
Rear cameras	1	1
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	32 MP	13 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,200 mAh	5,200 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	10.8 h
Wired charging	33 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	55%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	30 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	—	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.1	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-28.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HIOS 15.1

Related comparisons

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsTecno Spark 40 Pro+7.37.2

Xiaomi Redmi 15vsTecno Spark 40 Pro+7.27.2

Tecno Spark 40 Pro+vsInfinix Hot 60 Pro+7.27.2

Tecno Spark 40 Pro+vsTecno Spark 20 Pro+7.26.5

Vivo Y39vsTecno Spark 40 Pro+7.07.2