- android.gs
- Compare
- 50 XL NxtPaper vs Poco X6
TCL 50 XL NxtPaper vs Xiaomi Poco X6
What 50 XL NxtPaper does better (3) and where Poco X6 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display8.6
6.8Camera8.4
5.8Battery5.4
8.1Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
50 XL NxtPaperPoco X6
| 50 XL NxtPaper | Poco X6 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.6 mm | 161.2 mm | +6.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74.3 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 181 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50 XL NxtPaper better than Poco X6?
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco X6: No
- Memory card slotYes · Poco X6: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
Why is Poco X6 better than 50 XL NxtPaper?
- Wired charging18 W vs 67 W3.7×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · 50 XL NxtPaper: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · 50 XL NxtPaper: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Dual SIMNo · 50 XL NxtPaper: Yes
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 446 ppi+13%
- Weight199 g vs 181 g+10%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 167.6 mm | 161.2 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Space Blue | Black, White, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,339 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 533,112 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,945 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 792 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,010 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 10.2 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 68% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.22 W/kg | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
