- android.gs
- Compare
- 50 XE vs Armor Mini 20T Pro
TCL 50 XE vs UleFone Armor Mini 20T Pro
What 50 XE does better (7) and where Armor Mini 20T Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Display4.2
5.8Camera5.9
5.8Battery7.6
8.1Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
50 XEArmor Mini 20T Pro
| 50 XE | Armor Mini 20T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 133.5 mm | +30.6 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 63.3 mm | +11.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 24.9 mm | −16.6 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 301 g | −116 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50 XE better than Armor Mini 20T Pro?
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor Mini 20T Pro: No
- Weight185 g vs 301 g+63%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 24.9 mm3×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 4.7″+40%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor Mini 20T Pro: No
- Screen-to-body ratio84% vs 63.1%+33%
Why is Armor Mini 20T Pro better than 50 XE?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Battery capacity5,010 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+24%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · 50 XE: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 373 ppi+39%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Dual SIMNo · 50 XE: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 301 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 24.9 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 133.5 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 63.3 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Dark Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 4.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 373 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 527 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84% | 63.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 432,253 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,146 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 383 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,010 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.8 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Yes |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
