- android.gs
- Compare
- 50 XE NxtPaper vs Armor Mini 20T Pro
TCL 50 XE NxtPaper vs UleFone Armor Mini 20T Pro
What 50 XE NxtPaper does better (7) and where Armor Mini 20T Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Display4.2
5.8Camera5.9
5.8Battery7.6
8.1Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
50 XE NxtPaperArmor Mini 20T Pro
| 50 XE NxtPaper | Armor Mini 20T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 133.5 mm | +30.6 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 63.3 mm | +11.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 24.9 mm | −16.6 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 301 g | −116 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50 XE NxtPaper better than Armor Mini 20T Pro?
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor Mini 20T Pro: No
- Weight185 g vs 301 g+63%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 24.9 mm3×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 4.7″+40%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor Mini 20T Pro: No
- Screen-to-body ratio84% vs 63.1%+33%
Why is Armor Mini 20T Pro better than 50 XE NxtPaper?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Battery capacity5,010 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+24%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · 50 XE NxtPaper: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 373 ppi+39%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Dual SIMNo · 50 XE NxtPaper: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 301 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 24.9 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 133.5 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 63.3 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Space Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 4.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 373 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 527 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84% | 63.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 432,253 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,146 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 383 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,010 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.8 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Yes |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 1.19 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
