android.gs
Compare
50 Pro NxtPaper vs Redmi Note 13

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

What 50 Pro NxtPaper does better (4) and where Redmi Note 13 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

TCL · 202450 Pro NxtPaper

7.9Score

4 advantages≈ $320

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Redmi Note 13

6.7Score

6 advantages≈ $290

7.3Display7.7

7.4Camera7.1

7.1Battery3.2

7.4Features5.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

50 Pro NxtPaperRedmi Note 13

	50 Pro NxtPaper	Redmi Note 13	Difference
Height	167.6 mm	161.1 mm	+6.5 mm
Width	75.5 mm	75 mm	+0.5 mm
Thickness	8 mm	7.6 mm	+0.4 mm
Weight	196 g	174 g	+22 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 50 Pro NxtPaper better than Redmi Note 13?

Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 13: No
Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
eSIMYes · Redmi Note 13: No

Why is Redmi Note 13 better than 50 Pro NxtPaper?

RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
OLED panelNo · 50 Pro NxtPaper: Yes
Weight196 g vs 174 g+12%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Thickness8 mm vs 7.6 mm+5%
Screen-to-body ratio86.8% vs 88.9%+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper≈ $3207.9	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13≈ $2906.7
Design
Weight	196 g	174 g
Thickness	8 mm	7.6 mm
Height	167.6 mm	161.1 mm
Width	75.5 mm	75 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	—	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx4
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Moon Gray, Midnight Blue, Alps White, Pale Gold, Rosy Purple	Graphite black (Stealth Black), Arctic White, Ocean Teal, Prism Gold
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,460 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	991 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.8%	88.9%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 6300	Mediatek Dimensity 6080
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	405,118
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	1,968
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	371
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	108 MP	108 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.67"	1/1.67"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	32 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,010 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	9.8 h
Wired charging	33 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	—	50%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer (T803D only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.94 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	2	2
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	44 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	B	—