- android.gs
- Compare
- 50 5G vs Poco C75 5G
TCL 50 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C75 5G
What 50 5G does better (11) and where Poco C75 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Display5.9
3.5Performance3.4
5.8Camera4.1
5.8Battery6.3
7.7Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
50 5GPoco C75 5G
| 50 5G | Poco C75 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 171.9 mm | −7.8 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 77.8 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 212 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50 5G better than Poco C75 5G?
- AnTuTu score521,281 vs 391,505+33%
- NFCYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- eSIMYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Weight184 g vs 212 g+16%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Pixel density267 ppi vs 260 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
Why is Poco C75 5G better than 50 5G?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity5,010 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,849 vs 2,014+9%
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 600 nits+25%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+4%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 212 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 171.9 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Space Gray | Aqua Bliss, Enchanted Green, Silver Stardust |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 84% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ | Qualcomm SM4635 Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 611 |
| AnTuTu score | 521,281 | 391,505 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,849 | 2,014 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 141 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,010 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
