- android.gs
- Compare
- 50 5G vs Spark 20 Pro+
TCL 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 20 Pro+
What 50 5G does better (9) and where Spark 20 Pro+ wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Display8.0
3.5Performance3.6
5.8Camera6.6
5.8Battery4.2
7.7Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
50 5GSpark 20 Pro+
| 50 5G | Spark 20 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 164.7 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 75 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 179 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50 5G better than Spark 20 Pro+?
- AnTuTu score521,281 vs 386,262+35%
- 5GYes · Spark 20 Pro+: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,849 vs 1,787+3%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Memory card slotYes · Spark 20 Pro+: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Spark 20 Pro+: No
- eSIMYes · Spark 20 Pro+: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Spark 20 Pro+: No
Why is Spark 20 Pro+ better than 50 5G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 33 W+83%
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 1,000 nits2.1×
- OLED panelNo · 50 5G: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Pixel density267 ppi vs 393 ppi+47%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Weight184 g vs 179 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Space Gray | Temporal Orbits, Lunar Frost, Radiant Starstream, Magic Skin 2.0 Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 549 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 89% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 521,281 | 386,262 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,849 | 1,787 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 347 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,010 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 14 |
