- android.gs
- Compare
- Xperia 5 IV vs Pova Neo 2
Sony Xperia 5 IV vs Tecno Pova Neo 2
What Xperia 5 IV does better (23) and where Pova Neo 2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display5.4
8.4Camera3.7
5.5Battery7.6
8.8Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Xperia 5 IVPova Neo 2
| Xperia 5 IV | Pova Neo 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156 mm | 170.9 mm | −14.9 mm |
| Width | 67 mm | 77.8 mm | −10.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.6 mm | −1.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Xperia 5 IV better than Pova Neo 2?
- Wired charging30 W vs 18 W+67%
- OLED panelYes · Pova Neo 2: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova Neo 2: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Pova Neo 2: No
- 5GYes · Pova Neo 2: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Pova Neo 2: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density449 ppi vs 263 ppi+71%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2 GHz+50%
- Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
Why is Pova Neo 2 better than Xperia 5 IV?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- Main camera12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
- Screen size6.1″ vs 6.8″+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9.6 mm |
| Height | 156 mm | 170.9 mm |
| Width | 67 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Green, Black, Ecru White | Uranolite Gray, Virtual Blue, Orange Magma |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,520 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 449 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 979 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.2% | 83.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 835,038 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,448 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,129 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3. | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS |
