How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. XP Pro Thermal vs X300 Pro

Sonim XP Pro Thermal vs Vivo X300 Pro

What XP Pro Thermal does better (2) and where X300 Pro wins (28) — every spec side by side.

Sonim XP Pro Thermal
Sonim · 2025XP Pro Thermal
7.3Score
2 advantages≈ $830
vs
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo · 2025X300 Pro
9.6Score
28 advantages≈ $870
Higher score
5.5Display9.1
6.1Camera9.7
7.3Battery8.2
7.5Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

XP Pro ThermalX300 Pro
80 × 171.511.575.5 × 161.28
XP Pro ThermalX300 ProDifference
Height171.5 mm161.2 mm+10.3 mm
Width80 mm75.5 mm+4.5 mm
Thickness11.5 mm8 mm+3.5 mm
Weight267 g226 g+41 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is XP Pro Thermal better than X300 Pro?

  1. Memory card slotYes · X300 Pro: No
  2. Drop resistance classA vs B

Why is X300 Pro better than XP Pro Thermal?

  1. RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
  3. Major OS updates promised2 vs 52.5×
  4. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,510 mAh+30%
  5. OLED panelNo · XP Pro Thermal: Yes
  6. Optical stabilisationNo · XP Pro Thermal: Yes
  7. Telephoto cameraNo · XP Pro Thermal: Yes
  8. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  9. CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 4.21 GHz+60%
  10. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
  11. Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
  12. Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X300 ProVivo X300 Pro≈ $8709.6
Design
Weight267 g226 g
Thickness11.5 mm8 mm
Height171.5 mm161.2 mm
Width80 mm75.5 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Armor Glass
ColoursBlackPhantom Black, Mist Blue, Dune Brown, Cloud White
Display
Screen size6.6″6.8″
PanelIPS LCDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelNoYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,408 px2,800 px
Pixel density401 ppi452 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Measured brightness—2,113 nits
Screen-to-body ratio76%91.6%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 9500
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.63 GHz4.21 GHz
GPUAdreno 720Arm G1-Ultra
AnTuTu score—2,982,875
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—10,264
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—7,263
Memory
RAM8 GB16 GB
Storage (max)256 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperture—f/1.6
Main sensor size—1/1.28"
Rear cameras12
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3.7×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps120 fps
Selfie camera16 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh6,510 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—12.8 h
Wired charging—90 W
Charged in 30 min—69%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power—40 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2
USB version—3.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display, ultrasonic
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised25
EU label
Energy classCB
Battery charge cycles1,0001,200
Endurance per cycle41 h48 h
Repairability classCC
Drop resistance classAB
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare