- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos sense9 vs Redmi K80
Sharp Aquos sense9 vs Xiaomi Redmi K80
What Aquos sense9 does better (5) and where Redmi K80 wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display9.1
8.8Camera9.0
6.4Battery9.3
8.4Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos sense9Redmi K80
| Aquos sense9 | Redmi K80 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 149 mm | 160.3 mm | −11.3 mm |
| Width | 73 mm | 75 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.1 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 166 g | 206 g | −40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos sense9 better than Redmi K80?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Weight166 g vs 206 g+24%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K80: No
- eSIMYes · Redmi K80: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Why is Redmi K80 better than Aquos sense9?
- Wired charging36 W vs 90 W2.5×
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,550 mAh+31%
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+60%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+38%
- Pixel density422 ppi vs 526 ppi+25%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size6.1″ vs 6.7″+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 166 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 149 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 73 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, White, Green, Coral, Greige, Blue | Black, White, Mint, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO IGZO OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 422 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84% | 89.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,277,927 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,524 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,262 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,550 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 36 W | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | — |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
