- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos sense7 plus vs V27 Pro
Sharp Aquos sense7 plus vs Vivo V27 Pro
What Aquos sense7 plus does better (9) and where V27 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display7.4
6.7Camera9.1
7.3Battery5.7
9.2Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos sense7 plusV27 Pro
| Aquos sense7 plus | V27 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 164.1 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 74.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 182 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos sense7 plus better than V27 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 600 nits2.2×
- Stereo speakersYes · V27 Pro: No
- Battery capacity5,050 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+10%
- Memory card slotYes · V27 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · V27 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · V27 Pro: No
- Weight172 g vs 182 g+6%
- Pixel density403 ppi vs 388 ppi+4%
- USB version3 vs 2+50%
Why is V27 Pro better than Aquos sense7 plus?
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Aquos sense7 plus: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
- 4K selfie videoNo · Aquos sense7 plus: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.8″+6%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.4 mm+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.7% vs 90.4%+9%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 182 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 76 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Moon silver | Magic Blue, Noble Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IGZO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 978 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7% | 90.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 846,767 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,933 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,788 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,050 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.22 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 13 |
