- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos R9 vs X100s
Sharp Aquos R9 vs Vivo X100s
What Aquos R9 does better (5) and where X100s wins (12) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos R9X100s
| Aquos R9 | X100s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156 mm | 163.1 mm | −7.1 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75.8 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 203 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos R9 better than X100s?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Memory card slotYes · X100s: No
- eSIMYes · X100s: No
- Weight195 g vs 203 g+4%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+57%
Why is X100s better than Aquos R9?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Aquos R9: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+21%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 453 ppi+14%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.8 mm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 156 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Snow White, Forest Green | Titanium, White, Grey, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 732 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,233,931 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 7,661 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | — | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 136% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | OriginOS 4 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |



