android.gs
Compare
Aquos R9 vs iQOO 13

Sharp Aquos R9 vs Vivo iQOO 13

What Aquos R9 does better (5) and where iQOO 13 wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Sharp · 2024Aquos R9

8.6Score

5 advantages≈ $590

Vivo · 2024iQOO 13

9.5Score

16 advantages≈ $640

Higher score

8.3Display9.6

8.7Camera9.0

5.6Battery9.5

9.0Features9.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Aquos R9iQOO 13

	Aquos R9	iQOO 13	Difference
Height	156 mm	163.4 mm	−7.4 mm
Width	75 mm	76.7 mm	−1.7 mm
Thickness	8.9 mm	8 mm	+0.9 mm
Weight	195 g	207 g	−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Aquos R9 better than iQOO 13?

Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
Memory card slotYes · iQOO 13: No
eSIMYes · iQOO 13: No
Weight195 g vs 207 g+6%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+57%

Why is iQOO 13 better than Aquos R9?

Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 4,500 nits2.2×
Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+23%
Telephoto cameraNo · Aquos R9: Yes
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+54%
Major OS updates promised3 vs 4+33%
Pixel density396 ppi vs 510 ppi+29%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
4K selfie videoNo · Aquos R9: Yes
Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Sharp Aquos R9≈ $5908.6	Vivo iQOO 13≈ $6409.5
Design
Weight	195 g	207 g
Thickness	8.9 mm	8 mm
Height	156 mm	163.4 mm
Width	75 mm	76.7 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Schott Xensation Alpha
Colours	Snow White, Forest Green	Alpha (Black), Nardo Gray (Silver), White (BMW M branding), Ace Green
Display
Screen size	6.5″	6.8″
Panel	PRO IGZO LTPO OLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	3,168 px
Pixel density	396 ppi	510 ppi
Refresh rate	240 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,804 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.6%	90.2%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.8 GHz	4.32 GHz
GPU	Adreno 732	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	—	2,791,585
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	9,522
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,368
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.55"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	2×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	6,150 mAh
Battery type	—	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	18.1 h
Wired charging	—	120 W
Charged in 30 min	—	100%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	—	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-23.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	Funtouch 15 (International)
Major OS updates promised	3	4