- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos R9 vs Camon 30 Pro
Sharp Aquos R9 vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro
What Aquos R9 does better (6) and where Camon 30 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Display9.5
8.7Camera9.1
5.6Battery7.2
9.0Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos R9Camon 30 Pro
| Aquos R9 | Camon 30 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156 mm | 164 mm | −8 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 74.5 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.7 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos R9 better than Camon 30 Pro?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
- Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Major OS updates promised3 vs 2+50%
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
Why is Camon 30 Pro better than Aquos R9?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+11%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Weight195 g vs 189 g+3%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.7 mm+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 156 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Snow White, Forest Green | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 998 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 89.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 732 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 949,357 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,931 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,727 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | — | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 2 |
