android.gs
Compare
Aquos R9 pro vs Camon 40 Pro

Sharp Aquos R9 pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro

What Aquos R9 pro does better (14) and where Camon 40 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Sharp · 2025Aquos R9 pro

8.8Score

14 advantages≈ $1,100

Higher score

Tecno · 2025Camon 40 Pro

8.6Score

7 advantages

9.3Display8.5

9.3Camera9.1

6.4Battery7.3

8.4Features7.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Aquos R9 proCamon 40 Pro

	Aquos R9 pro	Camon 40 Pro	Difference
Height	162 mm	164.3 mm	−2.3 mm
Width	78 mm	74.6 mm	+3.4 mm
Thickness	9.3 mm	7.3 mm	+2 mm
Weight	220 g	179 g	+41 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Aquos R9 pro better than Camon 40 Pro?

Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Telephoto cameraYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
Wireless chargingYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 1,100 nits+82%
Pixel density513 ppi vs 393 ppi+31%
Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
eSIMYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+20%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 4+75%
USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is Camon 40 Pro better than Aquos R9 pro?

Wired charging32 W vs 45 W+41%
Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
Weight220 g vs 179 g+23%
4K selfie videoNo · Aquos R9 pro: Yes
Thickness9.3 mm vs 7.3 mm+27%
Screen-to-body ratio87.2% vs 89.7%+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Sharp Aquos R9 pro≈ $1,1008.8	Tecno Camon 40 Pro8.6
Design
Weight	220 g	179 g
Thickness	9.3 mm	7.3 mm
Height	162 mm	164.3 mm
Width	78 mm	74.6 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP66	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx6	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Black	Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	PRO IGZO LTPO OLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	3,120 px	2,436 px
Pixel density	513 ppi	393 ppi
Refresh rate	240 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	1,100 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,045 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	87.2%	89.7%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3	Mediatek Dimensity 7300
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	Adreno 735	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	700,909
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	3,218
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	873
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 2.
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/0.98"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	2.8×	—
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,200 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.8 h
Wired charging	32 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-28.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised	3	3