How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Aquos R9 pro vs Camon 40 Premier

Sharp Aquos R9 pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier

What Aquos R9 pro does better (11) and where Camon 40 Premier wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Sharp Aquos R9 pro
Sharp · 2025Aquos R9 pro
8.8Score
11 advantages≈ $1,100
vs
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Tecno · 2025Camon 40 Premier
8.8Score
8 advantages
9.3Display9.0
9.3Camera9.4
6.4Battery6.3
8.4Features7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Aquos R9 proCamon 40 Premier
78 × 1629.375 × 1617.7
Aquos R9 proCamon 40 PremierDifference
Height162 mm161 mm+1 mm
Width78 mm75 mm+3 mm
Thickness9.3 mm7.7 mm+1.6 mm
Weight220 g193 g+27 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Aquos R9 pro better than Camon 40 Premier?

  1. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Wireless chargingYes · Camon 40 Premier: No
  4. Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 1,600 nits+25%
  5. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  6. eSIMYes · Camon 40 Premier: No
  7. Pixel density513 ppi vs 460 ppi+12%
  8. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 4+75%
  9. USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
  10. Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,260 px+14%
  11. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%

Why is Camon 40 Premier better than Aquos R9 pro?

  1. Wired charging32 W vs 70 W2.2×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
  3. 4K selfie videoNo · Aquos R9 pro: Yes
  4. Weight220 g vs 193 g+14%
  5. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+12%
  6. Optical zoom2.8× vs 3×+7%
  7. Thickness9.3 mm vs 7.7 mm+21%
  8. Screen-to-body ratio87.2% vs 89%+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Sharp Aquos R9 proSharp Aquos R9 pro≈ $1,1008.8
Design
Weight220 g193 g
Thickness9.3 mm7.7 mm
Height162 mm161 mm
Width78 mm75 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP66IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx6IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursBlackEmerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelPRO IGZO LTPO OLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)3,120 px2,800 px
Pixel density513 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate240 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness2,000 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness—658 nits
Screen-to-body ratio87.2%89%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 8350
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3.35 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Mali G615-MC6
AnTuTu score—1,418,376
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—4,224
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,911
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1/0.98"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom2.8×3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,100 mAh
Battery type—Si/C
Active use (test)—11.6 h
Wired charging32 W70 W
Charged in 30 min—75%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-28 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised33
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare