- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos R8s vs Xperia 5 V
Sharp Aquos R8s vs Sony Xperia 5 V
What Aquos R8s does better (6) and where Xperia 5 V wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.5
6.2Camera8.4
3.0Battery6.9
8.9Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos R8sXperia 5 V
| Aquos R8s | Xperia 5 V | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159 mm | 154 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 68 mm | +6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.6 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 182 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos R8s better than Xperia 5 V?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,000 nits+30%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.1″+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.5% vs 83%+3%
Why is Xperia 5 V better than Aquos R8s?
- Wired charging15 W vs 30 W2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Aquos R8s: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Aquos R8s: Yes
- Battery capacity4,750 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+5%
- 4K selfie videoNo · Aquos R8s: Yes
- Pixel density403 ppi vs 449 ppi+11%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 12 MP+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- USB version3 vs 3.2+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 182 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 159 mm | 154 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 68 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Blue, White | Black, Blue, Platinum Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 746 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 83% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 946,039 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,546 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.35" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,750 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 16.3 h |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
