How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Aquos R8s pro vs nubia Z50S Pro

Sharp Aquos R8s pro vs ZTE nubia Z50S Pro

What Aquos R8s pro does better (6) and where nubia Z50S Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Sharp Aquos R8s pro
Sharp · 2023Aquos R8s pro
8.2Score
6 advantages≈ $1,000
vs
ZTE nubia Z50S Pro
ZTE · 2023nubia Z50S Pro
9.2Score
13 advantages≈ $860
Higher score
8.3Display9.1
6.8Camera9.6
5.4Battery6.8
9.6Features9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Aquos R8s pronubia Z50S Pro
77 × 1619.376.3 × 163.98.3
Aquos R8s pronubia Z50S ProDifference
Height161 mm163.9 mm−2.9 mm
Width77 mm76.3 mm+0.7 mm
Thickness9.3 mm8.3 mm+1 mm
Weight203 g228 g−25 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Aquos R8s pro better than nubia Z50S Pro?

  1. Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 1,200 nits+67%
  2. Memory card slotYes · nubia Z50S Pro: No
  3. eSIMYes · nubia Z50S Pro: No
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · nubia Z50S Pro: No
  5. Weight203 g vs 228 g+12%
  6. USB version3.2 vs 3.1+3%

Why is nubia Z50S Pro better than Aquos R8s pro?

  1. Wired charging27 W vs 80 W3×
  2. Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
  3. Optical stabilisationNo · Aquos R8s pro: Yes
  4. Telephoto cameraNo · Aquos R8s pro: Yes
  5. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  6. Rear cameras1 vs 33×
  7. Main camera47 MP vs 50 MP+6%
  8. CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+5%
  9. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
  10. Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+27%
  11. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
  12. Thickness9.3 mm vs 8.3 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Sharp Aquos R8s proSharp Aquos R8s pro≈ $1,0008.2
Design
Weight203 g228 g
Thickness9.3 mm8.3 mm
Height161 mm163.9 mm
Width77 mm76.3 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackPlasticSilicone polymer
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursBlackBlack, Khaki, Silver/White
Display
Screen size6.6″6.8″
PanelPRO IGZO LTPO OLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,730 px2,800 px
Pixel density456 ppi452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,000 nits1,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,029 nits
Screen-to-body ratio86.3%89.3%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.2 GHz3.36 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 740
AnTuTu score—1,650,939
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—5,569
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)256 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera47 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.6
Main sensor size1"1/1.49"
Rear cameras13
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3.3×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate—120 fps
Selfie camera13 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,100 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—12.5 h
Wired charging27 W80 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.1
USB version3.23.1
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—MyOS 13
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare