- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos R11 vs nubia Neo 5 GT
Sharp Aquos R11 vs ZTE nubia Neo 5 GT
What Aquos R11 does better (10) and where nubia Neo 5 GT wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display9.8
9.2Camera6.1
7.4Battery9.0
9.0Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos R11nubia Neo 5 GT
| Aquos R11 | nubia Neo 5 GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156 mm | 163.6 mm | −7.6 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.8 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 200 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos R11 better than nubia Neo 5 GT?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Neo 5 GT: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · nubia Neo 5 GT: No
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- CPU frequency3.21 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+23%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Neo 5 GT: No
- Weight195 g vs 200 g+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
Why is nubia Neo 5 GT better than Aquos R11?
- Wired charging36 W vs 80 W2.2×
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 6,210 mAh+22%
- Peak brightness3,600 nits vs 4,500 nits+25%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 439 ppi+11%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.4 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 156 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Navy, Ivory, Terracotta | Yellow, Gray, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 439 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.21 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 6,210 mAh |
| Wired charging | 36 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | MyOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 74 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
