How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Galaxy Z TriFold

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

What Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra does better (10) and where Galaxy Z TriFold wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
9.2Score
10 advantages≈ $1,900
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z TriFold
9.0Score
5 advantages≈ $3,100
8.7Display5.0
9.1Performance9.4
9.5Camera9.0
7.8Battery7.9
9.3Features7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Z Fold8 UltraGalaxy Z TriFold
143.2 × 158.44.1214.1 × 159.23.9
Galaxy Z Fold8 UltraGalaxy Z TriFoldDifference
Height158.4 mm159.2 mm−0.8 mm
Width143.2 mm214.1 mm−70.9 mm
Thickness4.1 mm3.9 mm+0.2 mm
Weight215 g309 g−94 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better than Galaxy Z TriFold?

  1. Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,600 nits+88%
  2. Pixel density422 ppi vs 269 ppi+57%
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)11,124 vs 9,710+15%
  4. Weight215 g vs 309 g+44%
  5. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  6. CPU frequency4.74 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+6%
  7. Resolution (width)2,256 px vs 1,584 px+42%
  8. Charged in 30 min67% vs 50%+34%
  9. Wireless charging power20 W vs 15 W+33%
  10. Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is Galaxy Z TriFold better than Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score2,160,310 vs 2,926,532+35%
  2. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,600 mAh+12%
  3. Screen size8″ vs 10″+25%
  4. Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  5. Thickness4.1 mm vs 3.9 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight215 g309 g
Thickness4.1 mm3.9 mm
Height158.4 mm159.2 mm
Width143.2 mm214.1 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP48IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus 2Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2
ColoursGraphite, Cream, Violet ShadowCrafted Black
StylusYes—
Display
Screen size8″10″
PanelFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2XTri-foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,256 px1,584 px
Resolution (height)2,504 px2,160 px
Pixel density422 ppi269 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness1,432 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.1%89.6%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.74 GHz4.47 GHz
GPUAdreno 840Adreno 830
AnTuTu score2,160,3102,926,532
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)11,1249,710
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,772—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.3"1/1.3"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera10 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,600 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Ion
Active use (test)13.1 h—
Wired charging45 W45 W
Charged in 30 min67%50%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power20 W15 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth65.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYesYes
Ultra WidebandYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-29.3 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)0.82 W/kg1.18 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 17Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 9One UI 8.5
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle51 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare