How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Z Fold7 vs X Fold3

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo X Fold3

What Galaxy Z Fold7 does better (9) and where X Fold3 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Samsung · 2025Galaxy Z Fold7
8.1Score
9 advantages≈ $950
vs
Vivo X Fold3
Vivo · 2024X Fold3
8.8Score
6 advantages≈ $970
Higher score
5.7Display9.4
9.0Camera7.4
4.4Battery8.8
9.3Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Z Fold7X Fold3
143.2 × 158.44.2142.7 × 1604.7
Galaxy Z Fold7X Fold3Difference
Height158.4 mm160 mm−1.6 mm
Width143.2 mm142.7 mm+0.5 mm
Thickness4.2 mm4.7 mm−0.5 mm
Weight215 g219 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Z Fold7 better than X Fold3?

  1. Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
  2. Wireless chargingYes · X Fold3: No
  3. Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
  4. CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+40%
  5. 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold3: No
  6. eSIMYes · X Fold3: No
  7. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
  8. Thickness4.2 mm vs 4.7 mm+12%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%

Why is X Fold3 better than Galaxy Z Fold7?

  1. Wired charging25 W vs 80 W3.2×
  2. Battery capacity4,400 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+25%
  3. Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 4,500 nits+73%
  4. Selfie camera10 MP vs 32 MP3.2×
  5. Pixel density368 ppi vs 413 ppi+12%
  6. Resolution (width)1,968 px vs 2,200 px+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X Fold3Vivo X Fold3≈ $9708.8
Design
Weight215 g219 g
Thickness4.2 mm4.7 mm
Height158.4 mm160 mm
Width143.2 mm142.7 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP48—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2—
ColoursBlue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jet Black, MintBlack, White
StylusYes—
Display
Screen size8″8″
PanelFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2XFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,968 px2,200 px
Resolution (height)2,184 px2,480 px
Pixel density368 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,600 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness1,408 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90%90.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 EliteQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.47 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,995,132—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,152—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,952—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.3"1/1.49"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×2×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera10 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,400 mAh5,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)11.7 h—
Wired charging25 W80 W
Charged in 30 min50%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-28 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)1.42 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 9OriginOS 4
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classB—
Battery charge cycles2,000—
Endurance per cycle40 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare