How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Z Flip8 vs Nubia Fold

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 vs ZTE Nubia Fold

What Galaxy Z Flip8 does better (5) and where Nubia Fold wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Samsung · 2026Galaxy Z Flip8
7.8Score
5 advantages≈ $900
vs
ZTE Nubia Fold
ZTE · 2025Nubia Fold
8.2Score
10 advantages≈ $1,100
Higher score
6.4Display8.8
4.9Camera6.7
5.7Battery8.1
9.6Features5.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Z Flip8Nubia Fold
75.4 × 166.96.1144 × 1605.4
Galaxy Z Flip8Nubia FoldDifference
Height166.9 mm160 mm+6.9 mm
Width75.4 mm144 mm−68.6 mm
Thickness6.1 mm5.4 mm+0.7 mm
Weight180 g249 g−69 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Z Flip8 better than Nubia Fold?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Wireless chargingYes · Nubia Fold: No
  4. Weight180 g vs 249 g+38%
  5. CPU frequency4.74 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+10%

Why is Nubia Fold better than Galaxy Z Flip8?

  1. Wired charging25 W vs 55 W2.2×
  2. Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 6,560 mAh+53%
  3. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 2,200 px2×
  4. Max video4K vs 8K
  5. Selfie camera10 MP vs 20 MP2×
  6. Screen size6.9″ vs 8″+16%
  7. Pixel density400 ppi vs 414 ppi+3%
  8. Thickness6.1 mm vs 5.4 mm+13%
  9. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
  10. Screen-to-body ratio87.1% vs 89%+2%
Specifications

Side by side

ZTE Nubia FoldZTE Nubia Fold≈ $1,1008.2
Design
Weight180 g249 g
Thickness6.1 mm5.4 mm
Height166.9 mm160 mm
Width75.4 mm144 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP48IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
ColoursGraphite, Cream, Pink, MintBlack
Display
Screen size6.9″8″
PanelFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2XOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,080 px2,200 px
Resolution (height)2,520 px2,480 px
Pixel density400 ppi414 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits—
Measured brightness1,470 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio87.1%89%
HDRYes—
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - US/CA/CNQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.74 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUAdreno 840 - US/CA/CN Xclipse 960 - ROWAdreno 830
AnTuTu score1,821,743—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,466—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,916—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8—
Main sensor size1/1.56"—
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera10 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,300 mAh6,560 mAh
Battery typeSi/C—
Active use (test)14.2 h—
Wired charging25 W55 W
Charged in 30 min55%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C
USB version3.2—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.9 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.74 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 17Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 9—
Major OS updates promised7—
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle44 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare