- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy XCover7 vs Spark 30
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 vs Tecno Spark 30
What Galaxy XCover7 does better (10) and where Spark 30 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Display6.0
3.7Performance3.0
4.1Camera5.7
2.7Battery4.6
8.4Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy XCover7Spark 30
| Galaxy XCover7 | Spark 30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169 mm | 168 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 80.1 mm | 76.4 mm | +3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 7.7 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Weight | 240 g | 193 g | +47 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy XCover7 better than Spark 30?
- AnTuTu score518,777 vs 354,158+46%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- 5GYes · Spark 30: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,900 vs 1,442+32%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- eSIMYes · Spark 30: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 38%+32%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Spark 30 better than Galaxy XCover7?
- Battery capacity4,050 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+23%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy XCover7: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 800 nits+33%
- Weight240 g vs 193 g+24%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 240 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 169 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 80.1 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Black | Stellar Shadow, Astral Ice, Magic Skin 3.0, Bumblebee Edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 555 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77.5% | 85% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ | Mediatek Helio G91 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 518,777 | 354,158 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,900 | 1,442 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,050 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors |
| SAR (head) | 1.08 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HIOS 14.5 |
