- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Y400
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Vivo Y400
What Galaxy XCover7 Pro does better (9) and where Y400 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display8.4
6.7Camera5.9
2.8Battery9.0
9.6Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy XCover7 ProY400
| Galaxy XCover7 Pro | Y400 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.6 mm | 162.3 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Width | 79.9 mm | 75.3 mm | +4.6 mm |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 7.9 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Weight | 240 g | 197 g | +43 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy XCover7 Pro better than Y400?
- NFCYes · Y400: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y400: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Y400: No
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is Y400 better than Galaxy XCover7 Pro?
- Wired charging15 W vs 90 W6×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,800 nits3.6×
- Battery capacity4,350 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+38%
- OLED panelNo · Galaxy XCover7 Pro: Yes
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Weight240 g vs 197 g+22%
- Thickness10.2 mm vs 7.9 mm+29%
- Screen-to-body ratio77.9% vs 87.9%+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 240 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 10.2 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 168.6 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 79.9 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Black | Glam White, Olive Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77.9% | 87.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 961,191 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,315 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,350 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.81 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | Funtouch 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 38 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
