- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs Blade V40 Vita
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs ZTE Blade V40 Vita
What Galaxy XCover6 Pro does better (17) and where Blade V40 Vita wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display5.1
6.7Camera3.9
3.0Battery7.4
8.4Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy XCover6 ProBlade V40 Vita
| Galaxy XCover6 Pro | Blade V40 Vita | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.8 mm | 168 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Width | 79.9 mm | 77.5 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 9.4 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 235 g | 214 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy XCover6 Pro better than Blade V40 Vita?
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- 5GYes · Blade V40 Vita: No
- NFCYes · Blade V40 Vita: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Pixel density400 ppi vs 260 ppi+54%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+50%
- Wired charging25 W vs 22 W+11%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V40 Vita: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
Why is Blade V40 Vita better than Galaxy XCover6 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,050 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+48%
- Weight235 g vs 214 g+10%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+2%
- Screen-to-body ratio77.8% vs 84.5%+9%
- Thickness9.9 mm vs 9.4 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 235 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 168.8 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 79.9 mm | 77.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 493 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77.8% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 697,431 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,842 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,050 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 1.48 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.0 | MyOS 11 |
