- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs Pova 3
Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro vs Tecno Pova 3
What Galaxy XCover6 Pro does better (17) and where Pova 3 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Display5.2
5.2Performance2.5
6.7Camera4.6
3.0Battery8.3
8.4Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy XCover6 ProPova 3
| Galaxy XCover6 Pro | Pova 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.8 mm | 173.1 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Width | 79.9 mm | 78.5 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 9.4 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 235 g | 230 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy XCover6 Pro better than Pova 3?
- AnTuTu score697,431 vs 336,6342.1×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,842 vs 1,3752.1×
- 5GYes · Pova 3: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Charged in 30 min70% vs 30%2.3×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 3: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 450 nits+11%
Why is Pova 3 better than Galaxy XCover6 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,050 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+73%
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy XCover6 Pro: Yes
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
- Weight235 g vs 230 g+2%
- Screen-to-body ratio77.8% vs 83.2%+7%
- Thickness9.9 mm vs 9.4 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 235 g | 230 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 168.8 mm | 173.1 mm |
| Width | 79.9 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Black | Electric Blue, Tech Silver, Eco Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 389 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 493 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77.8% | 83.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 697,431 | 336,634 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,842 | 1,375 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 181 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,050 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.48 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.0 | HiOS 12 |
