- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S9 vs Xperia XZ2 compact
Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Sony Xperia XZ2 compact
What Galaxy S9 does better (15) and where Xperia XZ2 compact wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display5.4
6.3Camera4.2
2.8Battery2.3
6.7Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S9Xperia XZ2 compact
| Galaxy S9 | Xperia XZ2 compact | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 148 mm | 135 mm | +13 mm |
| Width | 69 mm | 65 mm | +4 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 12.1 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Weight | 163 g | 168 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S9 better than Xperia XZ2 compact?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- OLED panelYes · Xperia XZ2 compact: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Xperia XZ2 compact: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Xperia XZ2 compact: No
- Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 2,870 mAh+5%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Dual SIMYes · Xperia XZ2 compact: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Xperia XZ2 compact: No
- Pixel density570 ppi vs 483 ppi+18%
- Screen size5.8″ vs 5″+16%
- Weight163 g vs 168 g+3%
Why is Xperia XZ2 compact better than Galaxy S9?
- Main camera12 MP vs 19 MP+58%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 163 g | 168 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 12.1 mm |
| Height | 148 mm | 135 mm |
| Width | 69 mm | 65 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Gray, Blue, Purple | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.8″ | 5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,960 px | 2,160 px |
| Pixel density | 570 ppi | 483 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 740 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 653 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.3% | — |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Chip maker | Samsung | Qualcomm |
| Process | 10 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G72 MP18 | Adreno 630 |
| AnTuTu score | 611,930 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,000 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 19 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.5 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.55" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 2,870 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 15 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 40% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 10 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Rear |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, barometer, fingerprint | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, color spectrum, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 0.36 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Samsung Experience 9.0 | — |
