How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy S26 FE vs X200T

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE vs Vivo X200T

What Galaxy S26 FE does better (6) and where X200T wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung · 2026Galaxy S26 FE
9.1Score
6 advantages≈ $600
vs
Vivo X200T
Vivo · 2026X200T
9.6Score
14 advantages≈ $590
Higher score
8.1Display9.3
8.4Performance9.0
9.3Camera9.3
6.7Battery9.5
9.7Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S26 FEX200T
76.9 × 161.67.474.3 × 1608
Galaxy S26 FEX200TDifference
Height161.6 mm160 mm+1.6 mm
Width76.9 mm74.3 mm+2.6 mm
Thickness7.4 mm8 mm−0.6 mm
Weight193 g203 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S26 FE better than X200T?

  1. Major OS updates promised7 vs 5+40%
  2. Max video8K vs 4K
  3. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  4. Weight193 g vs 203 g+5%
  5. CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
  6. Thickness7.4 mm vs 8 mm+8%

Why is X200T better than Galaxy S26 FE?

  1. Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
  2. Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 5,000 nits2.6×
  3. AnTuTu score2,119,022 vs 2,725,989+29%
  4. Battery capacity4,900 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+27%
  5. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  6. Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
  7. Wireless charging power15 W vs 40 W2.7×
  8. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,035 vs 8,430+5%
  9. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  10. Pixel density385 ppi vs 460 ppi+19%
  11. CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+10%
  12. Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200TVivo X200T≈ $5909.6
Design
Weight193 g203 g
Thickness7.4 mm8 mm
Height161.6 mm160 mm
Width76.9 mm74.3 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus+Schott Xensation Core
ColoursBlueberry, Graphite, PistachioSeaside Lilac, Stellar Black
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelDynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,340 px2,800 px
Pixel density385 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,900 nits5,000 nits
Measured brightness1,268 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio88.7%90.4%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetExynos 2500Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
Chip makerExynosMediaTek
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores108
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.63 GHz
GPUXclipse 950Immortalis-G925
AnTuTu score2,119,0222,725,989
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,0358,430
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,275—
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3×
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera12 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,900 mAh6,200 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonSi/C
Active use (test)14.8 h—
Wired charging45 W90 W
Charged in 30 min69%70%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power15 W40 W
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video output—Yes
Ultra WidebandYes—
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-26.6 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.5 W/kg1.09 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 17Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 9OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised75
EU label
Energy classA—
Battery charge cycles1,200—
Endurance per cycle50 h—
Repairability classC—
Drop resistance classA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare