- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S24 Ultra vs iQOO Neo9S Pro+
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+
What Galaxy S24 Ultra does better (15) and where iQOO Neo9S Pro+ wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display9.2
8.3Performance8.8
9.8Camera8.9
6.8Battery9.0
9.8Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S24 UltraiQOO Neo9S Pro+
| Galaxy S24 Ultra | iQOO Neo9S Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 163.5 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 79 mm | 75.7 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 193 g | +39 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S24 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9S Pro+?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo9S Pro+: No
- Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo9S Pro+: No
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 1,400 nits+86%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,076 vs 6,334+12%
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo9S Pro+: No
- eSIMYes · iQOO Neo9S Pro+: No
- Pixel density505 ppi vs 453 ppi+11%
- CPU frequency3.39 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+3%
Why is iQOO Neo9S Pro+ better than Galaxy S24 Ultra?
- Wired charging45 W vs 120 W2.7×
- AnTuTu score1,453,497 vs 2,342,433+61%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Weight232 g vs 193 g+20%
- Charged in 30 min65% vs 124%+91%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 232 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 79 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor | — |
| Colours | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange | Blue/White, Black, White |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 505 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,447 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.5% | 89.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.39 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,453,497 | 2,342,433 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,076 | 6,334 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,983 | 4,939 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 13.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 124% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.06 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3
vsSamsung Galaxy S26 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.69.3
vsSamsung Galaxy A55vsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra8.19.3
vsSamsung Galaxy S23 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.29.3
vsGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XLvsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.39.3
vsXiaomi 14T ProvsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.49.3