- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S24 Ultra vs iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
What Galaxy S24 Ultra does better (11) and where iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display9.5
8.3Performance9.2
9.8Camera8.9
6.8Battery9.3
9.8Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S24 UltraiQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
| Galaxy S24 Ultra | iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 162.9 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 79 mm | 75.4 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 199 g | +33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S24 Ultra better than iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo10 Pro (China): No
- Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo10 Pro (China): No
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo10 Pro (China): No
- eSIMYes · iQOO Neo10 Pro (China): No
- Pixel density505 ppi vs 453 ppi+11%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,260 px+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) better than Galaxy S24 Ultra?
- Wired charging45 W vs 120 W2.7×
- AnTuTu score1,453,497 vs 2,727,275+88%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,100 mAh+22%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 4,500 nits+73%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,076 vs 8,767+24%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,983 vs 6,272+26%
- Weight232 g vs 199 g+17%
- CPU frequency3.39 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+7%
- Charged in 30 min65% vs 100%+54%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 232 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 162.9 mm |
| Width | 79 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor | — |
| Colours | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange | Black, White, Orange |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 505 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,447 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.5% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.39 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,453,497 | 2,727,275 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,076 | 8,767 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,983 | 6,272 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 13.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.06 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | OriginOS 5 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3
vsSamsung Galaxy S26 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.69.3
vsSamsung Galaxy A55vsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra8.19.3
vsSamsung Galaxy S23 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.29.3
vsGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XLvsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.39.3
vsXiaomi 14T ProvsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.49.3