How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy S23 vs Blade V50

Samsung Galaxy S23 vs ZTE Blade V50

What Galaxy S23 does better (17) and where Blade V50 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy S23
Samsung · 2023Galaxy S23
8.5Score
17 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
vs
ZTE Blade V50
ZTE · 2023Blade V50
7.3Score
6 advantages≈ $240
7.8Display8.2
9.2Camera5.5
2.9Battery4.3
9.5Features7.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S23Blade V50
70.9 × 146.37.672.8 × 161.98
Galaxy S23Blade V50Difference
Height146.3 mm161.9 mm−15.6 mm
Width70.9 mm72.8 mm−1.9 mm
Thickness7.6 mm8 mm−0.4 mm
Weight168 g178 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S23 better than Blade V50?

  1. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  2. Optical stabilisationYes · Blade V50: No
  3. Telephoto cameraYes · Blade V50: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · Blade V50: No
  5. Stereo speakersYes · Blade V50: No
  6. RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
  7. CPU frequency3.36 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+53%
  8. Rear cameras3 vs 13×
  9. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V50: No
  10. Max video8K vs 1080p
  11. 4K selfie videoYes · Blade V50: No
  12. eSIMYes · Blade V50: No

Why is Blade V50 better than Galaxy S23?

  1. Battery capacity3,900 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+23%
  2. Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
  3. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  4. Screen size6.1″ vs 6.7″+9%
  5. Selfie camera12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
  6. Screen-to-body ratio86.8% vs 91.1%+5%
Specifications

Side by side

ZTE Blade V50ZTE Blade V50≈ $2407.3
Design
Weight168 g178 g
Thickness7.6 mm8 mm
Height146.3 mm161.9 mm
Width70.9 mm72.8 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2—
ColoursPhantom Black, Cream, Green, Lavender, Graphite, LimeBlack, Blue, Mint
Display
Screen size6.1″6.7″
PanelDynamic AMOLED 2XAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,340 px2,400 px
Pixel density425 ppi395 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,750 nits—
Measured brightness1,198 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio86.8%91.1%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Unisoc Tiger T760
Chip makerQualcommUnisoc
Process4 nm—
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.36 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 740—
AnTuTu score1,231,075—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,950—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,669—
Memory
RAM8 GB6 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.56"—
Rear cameras31
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video8K1080p
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera12 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity3,900 mAh4,800 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Po
Active use (test)11.4 h—
Wired charging25 W33 W
Charged in 30 min50%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power15 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-27 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.96 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 8.5—
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare