android.gs
Compare
Galaxy S23 FE vs Blade V50

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE vs ZTE Blade V50

What Galaxy S23 FE does better (13) and where Blade V50 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy S23 FE

8.3Score

13 advantages≈ $220

Higher score

ZTE · 2023Blade V50

7.3Score

8 advantages≈ $240

7.7Display8.2

9.2Camera5.5

3.0Battery4.3

9.5Features7.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S23 FEBlade V50

	Galaxy S23 FE	Blade V50	Difference
Height	158 mm	161.9 mm	−3.9 mm
Width	76.5 mm	72.8 mm	+3.7 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	8 mm	+0.2 mm
Weight	209 g	178 g	+31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S23 FE better than Blade V50?

Optical stabilisationYes · Blade V50: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Blade V50: No
Wireless chargingYes · Blade V50: No
Stereo speakersYes · Blade V50: No
RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
Rear cameras3 vs 13×
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+36%
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V50: No
Max video8K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Blade V50: No
eSIMYes · Blade V50: No
USB version3.2 vs 2+60%

Why is Blade V50 better than Galaxy S23 FE?

Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+7%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Weight209 g vs 178 g+17%
Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
Selfie camera10 MP vs 16 MP+60%
Screen-to-body ratio83.2% vs 91.1%+9%
Thickness8.2 mm vs 8 mm+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE≈ $2208.3	ZTE Blade V50≈ $2407.3
Design
Weight	209 g	178 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	8 mm
Height	158 mm	161.9 mm
Width	76.5 mm	72.8 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	—
Colours	Mint, Cream, Graphite, Purple, Indigo, Tangerine	Black, Blue, Mint
Display
Screen size	6.4″	6.7″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	403 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,450 nits	—
Measured brightness	985 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	83.2%	91.1%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2200 - International	Unisoc Tiger T760
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Unisoc
Process	4 nm	—
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 920 - International Adreno 730 - USA	—
AnTuTu score	940,921	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,550	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	6 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	—
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	—
Rear cameras	3	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	8K	1080p
4K video frame rate	60 fps	—
Selfie camera	10 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,500 mAh	4,800 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	8.5 h	—
Wired charging	25 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-23.7 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.76 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 8	—
Major OS updates promised	4	—